Metriccode.io Under the Microscope: Red Flags Every Investor Should See

Domain age & WHOIS — newly registered and opaque

The metriccode.io domain was registered on June 11, 2025, and shows a one-year registration (expiring June 11, 2026). New domains are not proof of fraud by themselves, but are a common characteristic of scam sites because operators can spin up and abandon domains quickly. The public WHOIS is anonymised/hidden.

Why this matters: Legitimate long-running brokers typically have older domains and transparent WHOIS or clear corporate disclosure; anonymity + short domain age increases risk and makes tracing operators harder.

Low / uncertain trust scores from reputation tools

Scamadviser flags the site with a low/uncertain trust assessment — noting the recent WHOIS date and redacted owner details in its summary. These automated reputation tools combine domain age, hosting, WHOIS privacy, and other signals to produce a low-confidence score for metriccode.io.

Public reviews: mixed-to-negative reports and withdrawal complaints

Public review pages show a mix of positive and negative entries:

• Trustpilot lists Metriccode with a small number of reviews and mixed ratings; some reviewers allege serious problems (including complaints about inability to recover funds).

• Reviews.io has multiple reviews with an overall mid-range score, and some positive-sounding testimonials; however, mixed reviews combined with other red flags reduce their evidentiary value without verification. Reviews.io

• Independent watchdog pages and community posts (e.g., TraderKnows and Reddit threads) collect reports and flag withdrawal problems and “unregulated” status.

Withdrawal terms & ability to refuse requests

Metriccode’s published Terms & Conditions explicitly state the company “reserves the right to decline a withdrawal request” or to delay it under certain conditions. While all brokers may include compliance clauses, overly broad or vague language that gives the operator wide discretion can be abused to block legitimate withdrawals.

Why this matters: When withdrawal restrictions are combined with user reports of blocked/denied withdrawals, it becomes a critical red flag.

Conclusion

Metriccode exhibits multiple textbook risk indicators: a very recent domain registration with anonymised WHOIS, low/uncertain trust signals from reputation tools, mixed reviews including withdrawal complaints, vague T&Cs that allow refusal/delay of withdrawals, and use of an offshore corporate identity that’s hard to independently verify. Taken together these red flags justify caution and deeper verification before anyone trades or deposits funds.